<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Arthur Karadzhyan — PAGA Defense Commentary</title>
    <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary</link>
    <atom:link href="https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <description>Defense-side commentary on PAGA, wage-and-hour law, and the 2024 reform era — from a California employment defense practice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Doss v. Tesla: When the FAA's Own Exemption Sends the Whole Case Back to Court</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/doss-v-tesla-when-the-faa-s-own-exemption-sends-the-whole-case-back-to-court</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/doss-v-tesla-when-the-faa-s-own-exemption-sends-the-whole-case-back-to-court</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>Arbitration</category>
      <category>FAA</category>
      <category>Labor Code § 229</category>
      <category>Court of Appeal</category>
      <description>A Tesla yard hostler who moved trailers on factory grounds was held a transportation worker exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act — and with the FAA out, Labor Code section 229 kept the wage claims and the representative PAGA action in court. Arbitration programs built without a section 1 audit are carrying risk their drafters never priced.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Martinez v. Sierra Lifestar: Certification Denials Don't Survive a Formulaic Pay Error</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/martinez-v-sierra-lifestar-certification-denials-don-t-survive-a-formulaic-pay</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/martinez-v-sierra-lifestar-certification-denials-don-t-survive-a-formulaic-pay</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>Class Certification</category>
      <category>Regular Rate</category>
      <category>Court of Appeal</category>
      <description>The Court of Appeal reversed a class certification denial in a regular-rate case, holding the typicality analysis legally erroneous. The lesson runs in both directions: a payroll-configuration error is classwide by nature, and the defense that treats damage variation as a typicality shield is building on sand.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Leeper Holding Pattern: Running a Defense While Headless PAGA Waits for Fall</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/the-leeper-holding-pattern-running-a-defense-while-headless-paga-waits-for-fall</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/the-leeper-holding-pattern-running-a-defense-while-headless-paga-waits-for-fall</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>PAGA</category>
      <category>Arbitration</category>
      <category>Supreme Court</category>
      <category>Leeper</category>
      <description>Leeper v. Shipt is fully briefed, two companion cases are held behind it, and the court's published calendar makes fall 2026 the earliest window for a decision. What defense counsel does during the wait will determine what the decision is worth when it arrives.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two Years In: The Reform's Numbers Have Arrived, and Its Provisions Are Still Untested</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/two-years-in-the-reform-s-numbers-have-arrived-and-its-provisions-are-still</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/two-years-in-the-reform-s-numbers-have-arrived-and-its-provisions-are-still</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>PAGA Reform</category>
      <category>AB 2288</category>
      <category>SB 92</category>
      <category>LWDA Data</category>
      <description>June 19, 2026 marked two years since AB 2288 and SB 92 took effect. The filing data now shows the first sustained decline; the LWDA's first-ever PAGA regulations are through their public hearing; and no published appellate decision has yet construed a single reform provision. Each of those facts changes how the next PAGA notice should be handled.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Leeper v. Shipt: What the Grant of Review Means for Headless PAGA Claims</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/leeper-v-shipt-what-the-grant-of-review-means-for-headless-paga-claims</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/leeper-v-shipt-what-the-grant-of-review-means-for-headless-paga-claims</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>PAGA</category>
      <category>Arbitration</category>
      <category>Supreme Court</category>
      <description>The California Supreme Court's grant of review puts the viability of 'headless' PAGA claims squarely at issue. The answer will determine whether Viking River's arbitration framework can be circumvented through strategic claim abandonment.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Hohenshelt Practical Playbook: What to Do When You've Already Lost Arbitration Rights</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/the-hohenshelt-practical-playbook-what-to-do-when-you-ve-already-lost</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/the-hohenshelt-practical-playbook-what-to-do-when-you-ve-already-lost</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>Arbitration</category>
      <category>CCP § 1281.98</category>
      <category>Supreme Court</category>
      <description>Hohenshelt killed strict-liability forfeiture for late arbitration fee payments. But the decision does more than save future cases — it may rescue arbitration rights that were already declared forfeited.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Twenty Months In: Are the 2024 PAGA Penalty Caps Actually Being Applied?</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/twenty-months-in-are-the-2024-paga-penalty-caps-actually-being-applied</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/twenty-months-in-are-the-2024-paga-penalty-caps-actually-being-applied</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>PAGA Reform</category>
      <category>AB 2288</category>
      <category>SB 92</category>
      <category>Penalty Caps</category>
      <description>AB 2288 and SB 92 created the most significant shift in PAGA defense strategy since 2004. But twenty months after enactment, no published appellate decision has interpreted the reform provisions. What do we know about how they are working in practice?</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Commission Forfeiture Theory Nobody's Raising — and Why Every Dealership Should Be Worried</title>
      <link>https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/the-commission-forfeiture-theory-nobody-s-raising-and-why-every-dealership</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.arthurkaradzhyan.com/commentary/the-commission-forfeiture-theory-nobody-s-raising-and-why-every-dealership</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 12:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <dc:creator>Arthur Karadzhyan</dc:creator>
      <category>Commissions</category>
      <category>Sciborski</category>
      <category>Automotive</category>
      <category>Novel Theory</category>
      <description>Why a theory this strong stays out of complaints, and what a dealership should do before a plaintiff's firm finally reads Sciborski closely. The pay-plan language, the exposure arithmetic, and the fix that closes it.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
