Interactive Tool
Recoverability Checker
Analyzes each alleged violation category to determine whether the associated monetary remedy is a 'civil penalty' recoverable through PAGA or a wage/damages remedy that PAGA does not authorize. Includes Category Analysis mode (individual violation assessment) and Demand Comparison mode (side-by-side analysis of plaintiff's demand versus PAGA-authorized recovery). Applies the ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court and Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection analytical frameworks.
All calculations run in your browser. No data is transmitted or stored.
The recoverability analysis asks three questions for each violation: (1) Is there a specific civil penalty statute? (2) If so, is it a penalty PAGA authorizes an aggrieved employee to recover? (3) If not, does the default penalty under section 2699(f) apply? Step one is the step most often skipped, including by defense counsel conceding a rate. Section 558(a) specifically provides a fifty-dollar initial and one-hundred-dollar subsequent civil penalty for a violation of any section of Part 2, Chapter 1 — the chapter that contains section 510 — so an overtime claim does not run on the section 2699(f)(2) default at all, and section 558's figures are that statute's own schedule rather than the reform's, so they do not move with the notice date. Section 226.7 sits in Part 1, outside that chapter, and does run on the default; the same meal-period conduct pleaded under section 512 would not. Meal and rest period premiums under section 226.7 are wages, not penalties (Kirby). Overtime premiums are wages. Waiting time penalties under section 203 are penalties but present complex recoverability questions depending on characterization.
Interactive · Dual-Track Recoverability Checker
In a combined class action and PAGA case, the same violation creates two separate exposure tracks. Items that are NOT recoverable as PAGA penalties are often recoverable as class action damages — and vice versa. This tool maps both tracks for each violation type.
Select a violation category above to see the recoverability analysis.
For illustrative purposes only. Recoverability analysis based on ZB, N.A. v. Superior Court (2019) 8 Cal.5th 175 and Kirby v. Immoos Fire Protection (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1244. Authorized-column figures use the post-reform § 2699(f)(2) $100 default for notices filed on or after June 19, 2024; pre-reform notices run the $100/$200 analysis. Plaintiff demand rates are illustrative estimates of typical inflated demands, not actual statutory rates.
Other Tools
PAGA Penalty Estimator
Three-scenario exposure model
Regular Rate Calculator
Ferra and Alvarado methodology
Penalty Cap Qualifier
15% and 30% documentation
Statute of Limitations Calculator
PAGA vs. underlying lookback
Derivative Penalty Mapper
Naranjo penalty cascade
PAGA Reform Decision Tree
Post-reform strategic routing
Wage Statement Compliance Checker
Nine elements of § 226(a)
For illustrative purposes only. This tool does not constitute legal advice.