Penalty Cap Qualifier

Evaluates whether an employer's compliance documentation satisfies the 'all reasonable steps' standard for the 15% or 30% PAGA penalty caps under the 2024 reforms. Walks through the specific documentation categories — written policies, supervisor training records, payroll audits, employee acknowledgments — and scores the employer's qualification status with identification of documentation gaps.

All calculations run in your browser. No data is transmitted or stored.
Interactive · Penalty Cap Qualifier
Assess whether you qualify for the 15% or 30% penalty cap under the 2024 PAGA reforms (AB 2288 / SB 92).
Written meal period policy distributed to all employees
Brinker (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1004
Written rest period policy (off-premises permitted)
Augustus (2016) 2 Cal.5th 257
Written overtime/timekeeping policy prohibiting off-the-clock work
Lab. Code §§ 510, 1194
Signed employee acknowledgments on file for all policies
Supervisor wage-and-hour training recorded to all five § 1198.5(a)(2) elements — employee name, provider, duration and date, core competencies, resulting certification
Lab. Code § 1198.5(a)(2) (eff. Jan. 1, 2026) — an attendance sheet supplies one of the five
Corrective action taken with supervisors who did not comply — documented and dated, separately from training
Lab. Code § 2699(g)(2) — the fourth step the statute names by example
Periodic payroll audits conducted, with responsive action documented
Lab. Code § 2699(g) ('periodic payroll audits' — the statute sets no fixed interval)
Regular rate calculation methodology documented (includes all non-discretionary comp)
Alvarado (2018) 4 Cal.5th 542
Expense reimbursement policy with submission procedures
Lab. Code § 2802
Complaint mechanism with 2+ channels and anti-retaliation language
Time-clock rounding eliminated or data-verified as net-neutral
Donohue (2021) 11 Cal.5th 58
Meal/rest premiums calculated at regular rate, not base rate
Ferra (2021) 11 Cal.5th 858
Electronic attestation system for noncompliant meal punches
Records-request escalation protocol — § 226 / § 432 / § 1198.5 requests routed to counsel on receipt
Lab. Code § 2699(g)(1)
Use the buttons to mark each item: No / Undocumented / Documented
Score
0%
0 / 28 points
The 75% / 45% bands are this tool's analytical thresholds, not statutory tests — "all reasonable steps" is a totality assessment.
15% Cap Qualification
Unlikely Without Action
Documentation gaps identified
Dollar Impact
Exposure input:
$500.0K
With 15% cap: $75.0K
Savings: $425.0K
Documentation Gaps (14 items)
Written meal period policy distributed to all employees
Written rest period policy (off-premises permitted)
Written overtime/timekeeping policy prohibiting off-the-clock work
Signed employee acknowledgments on file for all policies
Supervisor wage-and-hour training recorded to all five § 1198.5(a)(2) elements — employee name, provider, duration and date, core competencies, resulting certification
Corrective action taken with supervisors who did not comply — documented and dated, separately from training
Periodic payroll audits conducted, with responsive action documented
Regular rate calculation methodology documented (includes all non-discretionary comp)
Expense reimbursement policy with submission procedures
Complaint mechanism with 2+ channels and anti-retaliation language
Time-clock rounding eliminated or data-verified as net-neutral
Meal/rest premiums calculated at regular rate, not base rate
Electronic attestation system for noncompliant meal punches
Records-request escalation protocol — § 226 / § 432 / § 1198.5 requests routed to counsel on receipt
Read the AnalysisAB 2288 & SB 92: A Defense-Side Roadmap to the 2024 PAGA Reforms →
For illustrative purposes only. Penalty cap qualification depends on the specific facts of each case. Lab. Code § 2699(g)(1) (15% cap); § 2699(h)(1) (30% cap). Both figures are qualified by § 2699(e)(2), which lets a court award less — or exceed the limitation — where confining the award to it would be unjust, arbitrary and oppressive, or confiscatory.
For illustrative purposes only. This tool does not constitute legal advice.